espeng

COSIPLAN

UNASUR

Stage I

During 2003-2004 the application of the methodology of indicative Territorial Planning in the meetings of the Executive Technical Groups (GTEs) of the Integration and Development Hubs stood out, under a scheme of participative work of the countries, where it fostered the creation and management of the project portfolio with a regional vision as an integrating factor of the national visions

The project portfolio was set up by following indicative territorial planning methodology, agreed upon by consensus among the twelve countries and aimed at three essential objectives:

  • The widest understanding of the contribution that each group of projects can make to sustainable development, through physical integration;
  • The most specific linkage between the integration strategy and the projects within their spaces; and
  • Identification of the effects of groups of projects on sustainability and a better logistic functionality for all investments.

The process of planning in this stage was conducted in two phases:

  • First phase: Grouping of each Hub’s projects;
  • Second phase: Establishment of analysis factors and Evaluation of project groups.

During this first phase, the grouping of projects within each EID was carried out on the basis of synergies and, through meetings of the Executive Technical Groups the project groups, their anchor projects and strategic functions.

The second phase consisted of the definition of a structure of factors which seizes the attributes of each project group in terms of its impact on regional integration and development and the feasibility of its implementation.

Two strategic analysis dimensions were defined by the National Coordinators:

  • Impacts on sustainable development, particularly on its economic, social and environmental dimensions.
  • Implementation feasibility, stemming from its technical viability, capacity to access funding from different sources and political convergence.

Based on these two dimensions, we performed in GTE meetings assessing the project groups. This process had two distinctive features:

  • It was qualitative in nature, that is to say, it was based on the convergence of expert opinions on the expected impact of the groups’ implementation for each analysis dimension.
  • It was hierarchical in nature, attempting to identify impacts by comparing the groups so as to establish a relative order at each analysis sub-factor level.

Main Concepts of the Methodology:

Integration and Development Hubs

Integration and Development Hubs are multinational territories involving natural spaces, human settlements, production areas, and current trade flow. The Integration and Development Hubs are a territorial reference for the sustainable development of the region, which will facilitate access to areas with a high production potential that are currently isolated or underutilized due to the deficient provision of basic transport, energy, or communication services. In IIRSA identified 10 Integration and Development Hubs.

Project Groups

A group is a set of interdependent projects in a given space of the economic geography having synergetic effects upon sustainable development. That is, the grouping process is based on the possibility of capitalizing on the benefits of a set of investments, which are greater than the aggregate effects of its individual component projects (synergy). The process is territory-based and takes into account the location of projects, their relationships with the prevailing or potential economic activities, and the related environmental and social aspects.

Synergy is vertical when projects are grouped on the basis of input-output relations within a functional systemic chain (for example, port-road). It is horizontal when it refers to the use of common resources or ease of implementation or operation (hydroelectric power station-waterway). Consequently, the identification of synergies when setting up the project groups optimizes their benefits and favors the promotion of investments.

Strategic Function

The effects of a project group are reflected in their strategic function, i.e. their common objective and main benefits for both the integration and the regional development of the territories involved. The strategic function has to do with the direct linkage of the project group to the specific territorial aspects of its area of influence and to the business vision of the pertinent Hub.

Anchor Project

The Anchor Project which gives meaning to the grouping process and makes synergies viable. This project is no necessarily the largest-sized one, but the bottleneck or missing link in the infrastructure network that, as such, hinders the optimum use of the combined effects of the group for the sake of economic and social development. The Anchor Project may be a project already existing. In this case, it is called existing Anchor Project. Consequently, each group is formed around an anchor project or existing anchor project.

Hinge Project

Hinge projects are projects that articulate two or more Integration and Development Hubs or that play a role in more than one Hub. For instance, a port located in the territory of two Hubs. In the horizontal Hub, they integrate the inland and coastal areas, and in the vertical Hub they integrate the Northern and Southern regions and vice versa.

Documents
Ordenar por:

  • Addendum: Progress Achieved During 2005

    May 2013
  • IIRSA Project Portfolio 2004

    esp
    December 2004
  • Presentación de la medología de evaluación de los grupos de proyectos

    esp
    June 2004
  • Project Portfolio Analisys

    eng | esp
  • Project Portfolio of the Integration and Development Hubs 2003

VIEW ALL Documents

Events

VIEW ALL Events